
pic from
metrojacksonvilleIn the old Jacksonville you could say something about what downtown businesses and stakeholders thought of a certain project or legislation. People would believe you whether it was true or not. That was then.
I was sent a post from an ongoing story of how JTA is selling the BRT at the expense of downtown. It is from
MetroJacksonville who has done multiple studies and comparisons. Things you would want to see like what other cities are doing this. What are the successes? What cities are doing alternatives (like the much cheaper and efficient light rail)? Click around the MJ site and read up. In fact, search the term "BRT" and you will find 30 stories most are specifically about the BRT, ahem, project.
Now click on over to
JTA. There is no compelling story at
JTA on the subject. Nothing really informative at all unless you can travel back in time and go to the meetings listed. This system is estimated (several changes) to cost between $300 million and $750 and this is your communication to world. WTF?
No
WAIT, click the teeny-tiny "What's New" button on the left and you get a ton of stuff. Maybe their web designer thought this was a good idea. But I warn you, if you
download this brochure, while it looks nice, the exhaust will burn your eyes. Especially if you like to sit outside of your favorite cafe/bar/restaurant/coffeehouse. Here is an even more recent
brochure to download focusing on the Bay, Adams, Forsyth route. Why not State and Union? Seriously. Isn't it built for it already? Wouldn't it be much cheaper and convenient? Isn't it hooked directly to skyway? Doesn't that mean anything?
Thankfully the MJ folks are attending meetings and reporting results. Because frankly I am at too many taskforce/groups/committee/non-profit/community meetings myself right now. BIG Thanks to those guys and anyone who can make these meetings. From the beautiful historic core of a great Florida city on the mighty St Johns. Seriously. Thanks.
I especially applaud Lakelander (seasoned urban architect and planner) and Ocklawaha (best I can tell the most experienced transportation person outside of JTA and DOT- and possibly inside, who knows?) Ock had this to say in a recent post about a public BRT meeting:
Overall, I thought most meant well, but were completely ignorant of the different types of mass transit and the true costs and effects of BRT's flexibility and rubber wheels on transit oriented development. I even got in a shouting match with two who felt BRT should run roughshed through Adams Street, instead of State & Union. One lady even mentioned that we shouldn't be concerned about the effects of BRT on downtown and that we were there to push transit, not downtown development. Another fellow (who claimed to live on Church Street), questioned how involved I am in the downtown scene and flat out stated that downtown residents, businesses, DVI and the JEDC wanted BRT down Adams, Bay & Forsyth.
DVI has spoken against the current plan publicly. Secondly, I know of not one resident or business who supports 24/7 bus only traffic shoved up Adams, Bay, and Forsyth Streets. Not one. I would guess that I know as many or more residents and businesses downtown than anyone in the core. Just a guess. I could be wrong.
I feel that if somebody supported this they are wise not talk about it. Because talking about it would bring public input, public
education on the subject, and some serious logic exercises. Public input would kill an idea that costs $300-750 + million and is based on busing up our emerging downtown districts in the year 2030. Who is getting paid here? Who makes money on this deal? THAT party needs to arrange an outreach better than
this "what's new". This is pitiful. Whomever it is also needs to consider if its worth the fight. Because at this point the adversary is just annoying.
If they are unwilling to consider the simple yet critical move to non-vibrant streets, that says a lot. If not, I hope they are prepared to get a lot worse than Ock and Lake.